Work-Learning Research
  • Home
  • Solutions
    • Workshops
    • Learner Surveys
    • LTEM
    • Audits
    • Presentation Skills
    • Keynotes & Speaking
  • Resources & Learning
    • Will’s Blog
    • Catalog
    • Workshops
    • Coaching
  • Contact
  • Sign Up
  • About
    • About Overview
    • Mission
    • Speaking
    • Research Principles
    • Clients
    • History
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn

Learning Styles Notion Still Prevalent on Google

Education, Learning Industry, Myths and Worse, Research

Two and a half years ago, in writing a blog post on learning styles, I did a Google search using the words “learning styles.” I found that the top 17 search items were all advocating for learning styles, even though there was clear evidence that learning-styles approaches DO NOT WORK.

Today, I replicated that search and found the following in the top 17 search items:

  • 13 advocated/supported the learning-styles idea.
  • 4 debunked it.

That’s progress, but clearly Google is not up to the task of providing valid information on learning styles.

Scientific Research that clearly Debunks the Learning-Styles Notion:

  • Kirschner, P. A. (2017) Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166-171.
  • Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271.
  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
  • Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning styles: Where’s the evidence? Medical Education, 46(7), 634-635.

Follow the Money

  • Still no one has come forward to prove the benefits of learning styles, even though it’s been over 10 years since $1,000 was offered, and 3 years since $5,000 was offered.

Related

11 December 2017
Share this entry
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
https://i0.wp.com/www.worklearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/photo.png?fit=600%2C326&ssl=1 326 600 Will Thalheimer https://www.worklearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Logo-2023-5-Horizontal-1030x441.png Will Thalheimer2017-12-11 17:14:452017-12-11 17:15:21Learning Styles Notion Still Prevalent on Google

 

 

 

Hello, and Welcome to My Blog!

   = Will Thalheimer

I’ve been blogging since 2005.

======================

Mission:

To empower workplace learning-and-performance professionals to get the most from learning.

To help organizations build strategic learning and performance practices.

To bring research-inspired wisdom to the workplace learning field through my writing, speaking, workshops, evaluations, learning audits, and consulting.

The business case is clear. By utilizing the learning and performance sciences, we create more effect learning interventions, we waste less time and money on ineffective practices and learning myths, we better help our learners, and we better support our organizations.

See below for ways to find content:

 

Search

Search Search

List of Blog Posts

Categories

  • Awards
  • Books
  • Books for Leaders
  • Books on Better Management
  • Books on Human Behavior
  • Books on Instructional Design
  • Books on Learning
  • Books on Measurement & Data
  • Books on Neuroscience
  • Books on Persuasion and Influence
  • Books on Self-Improvement
  • Books on Teamwork
  • Books on Technology
  • Classic Posts
  • Conference Learning
  • Education
  • eLearning
  • Guest Post
  • Learning Industry
  • Learning Measurement
  • Myths and Worse
  • New Technology
  • News and Current Affairs
  • On-the-Job Learning
  • People
  • Performance Improvement
  • Presentation Skills
  • Research
  • Subscription Learning
  • Thoughts and Ideas
  • Uncategorized
  • Vendor Review
  • Whimsy
  • Work-Learning Academy
  • Work-Learning Research
  • Your Input Requested
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.