Work-Learning Research
  • Home
  • Solutions
    • Workshops
    • Learner Surveys
    • LTEM
    • Audits
    • Presentation Skills
    • Keynotes & Speaking
  • Resources & Learning
    • Will’s Blog
    • Catalog
    • Workshops
    • Coaching
  • Contact
  • Sign Up
  • About
    • About Overview
    • Mission
    • Speaking
    • Research Principles
    • Clients
    • History
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn

Jane Bozarth Pledges $1000 to the Learning Styles Challenge

Myths and Worse, Research

I’m thrilled and delighted to share the news that Jane Bozarth, research-to-practice advocate, author of Show Your Work, and Director of Research for the eLearning Guild, is pledging $1,000 to the Learning Styles Challenge!!

 

 

Jane has been a vigorous debunker of the Learning-Styles Myth for many, many years! For those of you who don’t know, the Learning-Styles Notion is the idea that different people have different styles of learning and that by designing our learning programs to meet each style—that is, to actually provide different learning content or activities to different learners—learning will be improved. Sounds great, but unfortunately, dozens and dozens of research studies and many major research reviews have found the Learning-Styles Notion to be untrue!

 

“Decades of research suggest that learning styles, or the belief that people learn better when they receive instruction in their dominant way of learning, may be one of the most pervasive myths about cognition.”

Nancekivell, S. E., Shah, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2020).
Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience:
Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 221–235.

 

 

“Several reviews that span decades have evaluated the literature on learning styles (e.g., Arter & Jenkins, 1979; Kampwirth & Bates, 1980; Kavale & Forness, 1987; Kavale, Hirshoren, & Forness, 1998; Pashler et al., 2009; Snider, 1992; Stahl, 1999; Tarver & Dawson, 1978), and each has drawn the conclusion that there is no viable evidence to support the theory.”

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015).
The scientific status of learning styles theories.
Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271.

 

With Jane’s contribution, the Learning Styles Challenge is up to $6,000! That is, if someone can demonstrate a beneficial effect from using learning styles to design learning, the underwriters will pay that person or group $6,000.

The Learning Styles Challenge began on August 4th 2006 when I offered $1,000 for the first challenge. In 2014, it expanded to $5,000 when additional pledges were made by Guy Wallace, Sivasailam “Thiagi” Thiagarajan, Bob Carleton, and Bob’s company, Vector Group.

Thank you to Jane Bozarth for her generous contribution to the cause! And check out her excellent research review of the learning-styles literature. Jane’s report is filled with tons of research, but also many very practical recommendations for learning professionals.

Related

24 February 2020
Share this entry
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
https://i0.wp.com/www.worklearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Jane-Bozarth-Photo-2020-Light-Frame.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1 300 300 Will Thalheimer https://www.worklearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Logo-2023-5-Horizontal-1030x441.png Will Thalheimer2020-02-24 14:38:592020-02-24 15:03:12Jane Bozarth Pledges $1000 to the Learning Styles Challenge

 

 

 

Hello, and Welcome to My Blog!

   = Will Thalheimer

I’ve been blogging since 2005.

======================

Mission:

To empower workplace learning-and-performance professionals to get the most from learning.

To help organizations build strategic learning and performance practices.

To bring research-inspired wisdom to the workplace learning field through my writing, speaking, workshops, evaluations, learning audits, and consulting.

The business case is clear. By utilizing the learning and performance sciences, we create more effect learning interventions, we waste less time and money on ineffective practices and learning myths, we better help our learners, and we better support our organizations.

See below for ways to find content:

 

Search

Search Search

List of Blog Posts

Categories

  • Awards
  • Books
  • Books for Leaders
  • Books on Better Management
  • Books on Human Behavior
  • Books on Instructional Design
  • Books on Learning
  • Books on Measurement & Data
  • Books on Neuroscience
  • Books on Persuasion and Influence
  • Books on Self-Improvement
  • Books on Teamwork
  • Books on Technology
  • Classic Posts
  • Conference Learning
  • Education
  • eLearning
  • Guest Post
  • Learning Industry
  • Learning Measurement
  • Myths and Worse
  • New Technology
  • News and Current Affairs
  • On-the-Job Learning
  • People
  • Performance Improvement
  • Presentation Skills
  • Research
  • Subscription Learning
  • Thoughts and Ideas
  • Uncategorized
  • Vendor Review
  • Whimsy
  • Work-Learning Academy
  • Work-Learning Research
  • Your Input Requested
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.